The country is more divided now that at any point in my lifetime, including the 60′s when anti-war protestors incited violence all over the country. I was just a kid then, but I remember vividly the images on television of wounded soldiers coming home from Vietnam, shootings at Kent State and especially the 1968 Democratic Convention in Chicago. That’s the one where anti-war protestors rioted with police outside the convention and it was all captured on live television for the world to see. It also destroyed Hubert Humphrey’s chances to be president.
The country was divided back then, but it was mostly over the war. There’s something different happening now, and it’s called the Obama reelection campaign.
The best way to get re-elected is to run on the accomplishments of your first term.
- The major accomplishment of Obama’s first term was Obamacare, which 60% of Americans want repealed and will most likely be ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court before the election.
- Well, how about financial reform? Remember Dodd-Frank? This was supposed to fix all the abuses that caused the 2008 financial meltdown. As Herman Cain so aptly put it, “there’s three problems with Dodd-Frank. First is the fact that it didn’t address the primary reason for the 2008 financial meltdown which was the government encouraging banks to give mortgages to people who couldn’t pay them back. The second and third reasons are Dodd and Frank.”
- How about his promise to keep unemployment below 8% if we only passed his $867 billion stimulus bill?
- How about his promise to cut the deficit in half during his first term?
I could go on and on, but I think you get the point.
Obama has a record now, and it’s not a record of unbridled successes. His only chance is to follow the script he learned years ago from Saul Alinsky, author of Rules for Radicals. Alinsky teaches community organizers how to gain power at any cost. The “rules” are cruel, divisive and controversial. They depend on a strategy of agitating, rubbing resentments, fanning hostilities and creating controversy. Obama and his team learned them well. They are already using them in an attempt to isolate and demonize their possible opponents. Following these rules are Obama’s only chance for re-election, but by definition, they’re meant to create an “Us versus Them” mentality.
He’ll have a $1 billion war chest which he’ll use to put these rules into action against his opponent. Please understand these rules so you recognize them being used in the campaign. Here is a brief summary:
RULE 1: “Power is not only what I have, but what the enemy thinks I have.” Power is derived from two main sources — money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood.
(These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)
RULE 2: “I never go outside the expertise of ‘my people’.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone.
(Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don’t address the “real” issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)
RULE 3: “Whenever possible, I go outside the expertise of the enemy.” I look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty.
(This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)
RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, I send 30,000 letters. I can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules.
(This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)
RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.
(Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? He wants to create anger and fear.)
RULE 6: “A good tactic is one ‘my people’ enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones.
(Radical activists, in this sense, are no different than any other human being. We all avoid “un-fun” activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)
RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t let it become old news.
(Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)
RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” I keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, I hit them from the flank with something new.
(Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)
RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist.
(Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists’ minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)
RULE 10: “If I push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to my side because the public sympathizes with the underdog.
(Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management’s wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)
RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” I never let the enemy score points because I’d be caught without a solution to the problem.
(Old saw: If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)
RULE 12: “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” I cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. I go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.
(This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)
According to Alinsky, the main job of the organizer is to bait an opponent into reacting. “The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction will be your major strength.”
